The objective of this article is to study the process of agricultural mechanization in the temperate economies of new European settlements (settler economies) from a historical and comparative perspective. The historical significance of agricultural activity in these countries is evident in the characteristics of their productive specialization and the modes of their international integration. First, the article proposes constructing an indicator of agricultural mechanization in Uruguay and New Zealand for an extended period (the entire 20th century). Second, it offers an exploratory analysis of the factors that influenced the diffusion and adoption of the tractor in both countries. The evolutionary and neo-Schumpeterian perspective on technical change and innovation provides a conceptual framework that addresses the complex nature of technological change and allows for the study of its evolution over time, emphasizing its tacit, cumulative, and path-dependent nature. Based on a comprehensive characterization of the tractor fleet and its evolution, a logistic model is applied to determine the dynamics of adoption and diffusion of this technology. In general terms, the introduction of the tractor marked a milestone in the process of mechanization and revealed a dynamic that exhibited particularities associated with the nature and evolution of technological change. Initially, the introduction of the tractor in agricultural activities responded to a slow adoption process—and replacement of other techniques—that constituted an early stage of learning, after which it spread rapidly across the productive structure of the analyzed countries. Ultimately, the process reached a saturation point that coincided with the emergence of new production techniques that have progressively replaced the previously dominant ones. Secondly, it is observed that the technological dynamics differed between the countries, with Uruguay consistently lagging behind New Zealand. Finally, the analysis of the determinants of the different rates of tractor adoption and diffusion in both countries reveal that New Zealand producers faced significantly more favorable conditions in terms of lower fuel costs and higher wages, which incentivized the adoption of labor-saving technology such as the tractor. Additionally, greater access to financing, lower tractor prices, and a more conducive agrarian structure for mechanization facilitated a faster and more sustained adoption of this technology compared to Uruguay.
Key words: agriculture, tractor, logistic model, technological adoption and diffusion.
